Diamond
Wog, Creem Magazine 06.75
By Trixie A. Balm
Since the fateful night Bowie hit Radio City with a funkadelic
thud last November, I've been dreading this album's release. Could it be
Dave's decided to bite the hands that feeds, post-Diamond Dogs? He can warble
"Nothing's gonna change my world" on Young Americans to his alter
ego's titillation, but I fear the irrecovcable worst is upon us: Bowie's
thrown in the towel on rock and concept music, preferring to booggie down
to prosperity instead. Okay, Dave . . . shortchange us perfervid dupes who
put stock in ya, even though we knew your financial intentions all along
and considered it fine because only fools don't worry 'bout making a buck.
.....I personally
feel gypped. By stifling his contemptuous tone, skirting scorn for things
pathetic and mundane that haunted his prior work, Bowie is neglecting statement.
By devoting himself to disco-soul, playing a purely commercial idiom in
lieu of making new strides, Bowie is shunning art. With an image attached
to about seven elpees with costume changes to match, it's impossible to
tell who the real Bowie is anymore. Once the Spiders disbanded, Bowie's
truncated Ziggy schtick was de-sapped. Tinsel to the wayside, his act deliquesced
into prophecy, warning of holocaust and a host of other chimerical feasibilities
during his Diamond Dogs. Bourroughs influenced phase. Supposedly theatrical.
I viewed last summer's Diamond Dogs tour as ineffectual spectacle. Sure,
Dave assembled and performed a fine show, but the scenery and backup band
were so disappointing that the concert became an ultimate let down. As for
the last Bowie tour, it literally didn't pay to blow twelve and a half bucks
in order to witness blase renderings of Bowie oldies juxtaposed with his
new stuporific soul bro pastiche, regardless of the bodacious Mike Garson
Group. I recall having the fierce urge to upstage Bowie during "Changes"
or besiege his manager to order a month's total rest immediately after the
show, because it seemed Bowie could barely manage onstage.
.....Nevermind
that Bowie wants to be in the mind, heart, and record racks of Young Americans;
he also wants to be the Young American - a a vicarious spade, a victorious
name. Never mind the title song concerns our emetic socio-political situation
("Do you remember President Nixon . . . the bills you have to pay,
or even yesterday?..."), adding discodanceable components like snappy
sax runs and gospelfied chorals, wrapping up with the obvious "I want
the Young American.! It's disturbing enough to think how easily Bowie could
finagle the latter with his chameleonlike savior-faire, knowing how a little
condescension can work wonders. Bowie seems to hope he'll inveigle American
youth through solidarity, relating on a common level, predicated on sheer
capitalistic desire.
.....I'm unconvinced
Young Americans is anything but commercial, unless it's another Bowie transition.
The words trite, unenthralling, and masturbatory come to mind. Young Americans
ain't got the visceral verve connected with most Bowie material; it's the
epitome of every shoddy, selfindulgent delusion Dave could muster, have
pressed into vinyl, and to try to sell. I wonder why John Lennon even bothered
to give his vocal and co-writing support ("Fame"), much less subject
"Across The Universe" to Bowie's washed-out histrionics whilst
accompanying the ensuing atrocity on guitar. "Fame" is structurally
identical to "Time" on Aladdin Sane, repeating the title, then
enumerating its consequential drawbacks. Composed by Bowie-Lennon-Alomar
team, "Fame" is a study in wretched rockstar commiseration, John
and Dave apparently taking turns writing lines as if an impromptu word game.
"Fame - Makes a man think things over . . . Puts him there, where things
are hollow." Probable Bowie-Lennon interplay, viz: ("Fame-")
"What you get is no tomorrow (Dave)" "What you need you have
to borrow (John)" "Is it any wonder - You're too cool to fool
(John)" "Bully for you, chilly for me (Dave)" "Got to
get a raincheck on pain (John)."
.....Whereas open
interpretation was necessary on Diamond Dogs, lyrics are included with Young
Americans - although improved mix quality make them a requisite convenience
which would've been appreciated more with the former cryptic david Bowie
album. Doesn't matter on Young Americans anyhow: "Can You Hear Me,"
"Win." "fascination" rely on love themes, funky sound
and beat more than lyrical content. "Young Americans" and "Somebody
Up There Likes Me" temper racial motifs with overtones of pathos and
dat oletime religion: "He's got his eye on your soul - his hand on
your heart, He says 'Don't hurry baby,' Somebody up there likes me."
An eerie two stanza Bowie tune, "Right," figuratively encapsulates
his career through gauzed wide angle lenses ("Taking it all the right
way . . . Never turning back"), the second verse sounding like the
combined euphoria of success and cocaine has pulverized Bowie, verily gone
to his head: "Flying in just a sweet place, Coming inside and sail
. . . Never been no, Never been known to fail."
.....Not yet,
perhaps. But even though I stuck with Bowie during his last stylistic change
- wouldn't listen when Diamond Dogs was vilified left and right - Young
Americans is a retrograde effort earning my heartsick disdain. I'd still
be raving over Bowie if only he'd stop reaffirming his superstatus with
tacky contrivances . . . if only he'd produce music of consistent celibre
(rock, R&B, jazz, whatever - though I'd say Bowie excels in rock and
wish he'd return to the fold after his filing). Hope this Young Americans
in-strut-with-the-time sidetrack is just passing caprice, as was the Diamond
Dogs round-the-corner cataclysm. Lord knows we need a lot more auspicious
artists and lot less jive. |